Hot Coffee Reaction Paper Essay

After watching the objective Hot Coffee, I realized that it greatly explained how sensation chance started a eye mask effect that shook up the guidance Government values big condescension forever. I strongly accept that Tort enlighten was meant to back big business and name away the rights of Americans who be wronged by these corporations. From a sociologist standpoint I can in particular see the concerns of a conflict idealogue because this is capitalism at its best.When Stella Liebeck sued McDonalds for a form of hot coffee that she spilled on herself, a lot of people origin solelyy viewed the circumstance as a joke and as a plan for someone to hold out rich quick. Before watching the infotainment I had no knowledge of the incident and thought it sounded give c are a face of subject abuse. Soon after watching, I saw the negligence of McDonalds by non monitoring the temperature of the coffee and the major(ip) reproach done to Stellas skin. The medical bills we re major and she deserved not only stipend for medical bills nevertheless relatiative indemnity as well. She was awarded 160,000 dollars in damages and 2.7 one thousand thousand in punitive damages (eventually decreased to 480,000). After such an infamous case, it open up the floodgates for other Americans to go after businesses that had wronged them.In a case for Stella, the police forcesuit was justified, and there were cases across the country were lawsuits were filed and many an(prenominal) were trying to get rich quick. sealed it is a controversial situation provided Tort Reform was used a defense mechanism for big business. Companies like tobacco corporations for example, were actually behind lawsuit abuse groups trying to help bring out tort reform to elevate them. They had all the money to back semipolitical endeavours fornominees that would favor tort reform. This I believe is a matter of capitalism because the rich are investing in themselves and are literal ly fixing campaigns by funding whomever they believe look after their best interest. As another example, The Chamber of Commerce are a committee assembled of big business corporations who fund political campaigns for nominees who back their political views and invest in their well be instead of the nation as a whole. In other words, the rich extremity their nominees to win in order to protect their investments, therefore they all band unitedly to achieve this goal.George W. Bush was definitely a beneficiary of highly funded campaigns and it showed. During his presidential campaign he was lobbying for Tort Reform and that meant capping punitive damages. on that point are cases where this cap hurts the people who are wronged from businesses that have wronged them. In the docudrama the case of Colin Gourley strongly was affected by tort reform.Lisa Gourley gave birth to twins and during her pregnancy was forever misdiagnosed and improperly observed. Because of the neglect of her doctor, one of the twins, Colin, was born with brain damage and would beg therapy and special healthcare for the remainder of his life. She was constantly uneasy with the progress of her pregnancy exactly was always reassured by her doctor. Because of negligence, Lisa Gourley was awarded 5.6 one million million million dollars in a lawsuit. However, due to the law in Nebraska, it was reduced to 1.6 million. This is a ground example of a system that failed a family due to tort reform.Ultimately this documentary opened my eyes to the many capitalist ways we operate as a country. This most definitely identifies with conflict theory. It is mute that this country is ran and protected by the wealthy. There are ways for things to change but this documentary demonstrates where our challenges lie.