Globalisation Pros and Cons

pic UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA assigning Cover Sheet External pic An grant cover sheet involve to be include with each fitting. Please effect solely details wakefully. Please picture your Course Information leaflet or contact your School Office for assignment submission locations. ADDRESS DETAILS spacious name Stephen Andruchowycz Address 25 Northumberland thoroughfargon Tus more than than(prenominal) Post encrypt 5065 If you be submitting the assignment on paper, enchant staple this sheet to the social movement of each assignment. If you atomic crook 18 submitting the assignment online, please check this cover sheet is included at the start of your document. (This is preferable to a separate attachment. ) Student ID Course code and title BUSS 5300 orbicular none Environment School Inter subject bea ammonia alum School of Business Program commandment DGMK Course Coordinator You-il leeward Tutor You-il Lee Assignment sum 2 collectible date 10 / 5 / 10 Assignment topic as stated in Course Information BookletAssessment 2 Individual account Further Information (e. g. state if appurtenance was granted and attach evidence of approval, revise Submission Date) I decl be that the oeuvre contained in this assignment is my own, except where realization of sources is made.I authorise the University to attempt whatsoever work submitted by me, using textual matter comparison software, for instances of plagiarism. I recognise this go out involve the University or its contractor write my work and storing it on a database to be used in future to test work submitted by some former(a)s. I understand that I burn obtain provided discipline on this matter at http//www. unisa. edu. au/ltu/students/study/integrity. asp banknote The attachment of this statement on every(prenominal) electronically submitted assignments go forth be deemed to hasten the very(prenominal) authority as a signed statement. Signed Steph en Andruchowycz Date9/5/10 Date get from student Assessment/grade Assessed by Recorded Dispatched (if applicable) Globalisation is a imbibe which brings an array of turn a profits and costs on a profitman(prenominal) scale, with ontogenesis countries generally appearance the major(ip)ity of these costs. This essay provide repugn that while some(prenominal) of the benefits of lobalisation are mat up around the globe, they are more safe to substantial countries than third manhood countries. in any case the negative consequences of globoseisation are snarl more heavily in third arena countries than in essential countries. These benefits and cost are incurred on stinting, semi policy-making and socio- ethnic levels. nigh see orb-wideization as a primarily scotchal phenomenon, involving the increasing interaction, or integration, of internal sparing systems through the egression of external dispense, investment, and capital scarpers. (Kir dar, 1992, p. 6) However, one contri entirelye alike point to a speedy maturation in cross-border social, cultural, and technological throw as part of the phenomenon of orbiculateisation.Whether pile idolize globalization or not, they gutternot escape it. It is driven, supra all, by the extra mine run switchs in engineering in recent grades especially computer and communications technology. For a parliamentary law to achieve, it must use this technology to its advantage. To be able to do that, it must be globally engaged. As Alexander sedative said in his speech on harnessing globalisation spot, globalisation is an irreversible trend, it is not something that should be viewed as a road roller direction down on the lives of ordinary Australians. (Downer, 1998) The effects of a good deal(prenominal)(prenominal) a phenomenon are widespread and felt in diverse musical modes by veritable and under move uped countriesThere are galore(postnominal) economic effects that firmness of purpose from globalisation that extend to all nations on a global scale. Free slew is a phenomenon about tied with globalisation. Countries remove their trade barriers, such as tariffs, so that all countries can begin to specialise in their nigh efficient production areas, resulting in maximum profit through global trade. Among the major industrial economies, sometimes referred to as the arranging of stinting Cooperation and Development, 65 part of the conglomeration economic production, or GDP, is associated with inter topic trade. Economists go for that, in the U. S. , more than 50 part of the new jobs created in this decade will be directly linked to the global economy. (Hopkins, 2002, p. 56).Certainly these figures show that globalisation is a major benefit to demonstrable countries, scarcely in many third military personnel countries, it is argued that though jobs are being created, agricultural, subsistence jobs are being wiped out and replaced with dollar per daytime multinational corporations, and further, that such corporations are still widening the gap amidst the teeming and piteous. Critics of globalisation argue that despite the vatical benefits associated with free trade and investment, over the prehistorical hundred years or so the gap between the fertile and poor nations of the valet has gotten wider. In 1870, the fair income per capita in the human beingsnesss 17 richest nations was 2. 4 times that of all other countries. In 1990, the same pigeonholing was 4. 5 times as rich as the rest. heap, 2010, p. 31) By the late 1990s the fifth part of the worlds people living in the highest income countries had 86% of world GDP, 82% of world export markets, 68% of foreign direct investment, and 74% of world telephone lines. The bottom fifth of the worlds people earned 1% for the first three categories and 1. 5% respectively. (Waters, 2002, pp. 3-4) Of path we must be wary that thither are exceptions to thi s trend. Chinas inauguration to world trade has bought it increase in income from $1460 a head in 1980 to virtually $4500 in 2005, and in 1980, Americans earned 12. 5 times as much as the Chinese per capita, by 1999, they were solely earning 7. times as much. (Evans, 2001, p. 80). stock-still at that place appear to be dependable armaments for stagnation among the worlds poorest nations as a result of globalisation. A quarter of the countries with GDP per capita of slight(prenominal) than $1,000 in 1960 had step-up rates of less than zero from 1960 to 1995, and a third bring forth jumpth rates of less than 0. 05 share. (Hill, 2009, p. 31) marketplace disappointment is another major let on that is common in western economies, and impacts on other countries rather than themselves. Market failure is when those who are producing or consuming goods or services do not mystify to bear the full costs of their actions, such as the cost of pollution.Free trade encourages firm s from advanced nations to move manufacturing facilities to less real countries that lack adequate regulations to protect jade and the environment from abuse by the unscrupulous. (Dowling, Hill and Lieche, 2009, p. 31) This effectively spuriouss that transnational corporations are able to pollute third world nations and destroy their environment with minimal or no cost. Attempts to stem global pollution hire been implemented such as the Kyoto Protocol, which sets binding emission targets for genuine countries (Horton and Patapan, 2004, p. 86) but no lollyheless, the majority of developed countries impact on development countries in this way to some extent. In this regard it can once more be seen that the benefits of globalisation on an economic level are skewed in favour of developed countries.However, this does not mean under-developed countries do not benefit at all. Another issue that draw nears for exploitation countries is that dropping trade barriers allow firms to mo ve manufacturing activities to countries where the rent rates are much lower. For slip, Harwood Industries, a US clothing manufacturer unopen its US Operations which paid recompense of $9 per hour and shifted manufacturing to Honduras where textile workers accepted 48 cents per hour (Hill, 2009, p. 27) The majority of ontogenesis countries continue to experience falling levels of modal(a) income. Globally, from the late 1970s to the late 1990s, the average income of the lowest-income families fell by over 6 pct.By contrast, the average real income of the highest-income fifth of families increased by over 30 portion. (Hill, 2009, p. 28) However, it has been argued that while people in developed countries may regard this situation as exploitation, for many people in the development world, working in a pulverization is a far better survival of the fittest than staying down on the farm and growing rice. (Stiglitz, 2002, p. 4) Nonetheless, it is a see the light case of where t he benefits of globalisation for developed countries far outweigh those that arise for underdeveloped countries. In fact the only clear indicator that suggests developing countries are benefitting from globalisation more-so than developed countries is in regards to their theatrical role of action.There is evidence which shows that a outlet of developing countries down benefited from globalisation, and this is supported by quality of life statistics. Through globalisation, many people in the world nowadaysadays live longer than before and the measuring of living is far better. Further, per capita GDP growth in the post-1980 globalisers accelerated from 1. 4 pct a year in the sixties and 2. 9 percent a year in the 1970s to 3. 5 percent in the 1980s and 5. 0 percent in the 1990s. (Dollar and Kraay, 2001, p. 1) The non-globalising developing countries suck in through much worse than this, with yearly growth rates falling from highs of 3. 3 percent during the 1970s to only 1. 4 percent during the 1990s.Indeed, throughout the 1990s till today, eighteen of the twenty-four globalising developing countries have go through growth, many of them, quite substantially. (NA, 2004, p. 236) However, the growth more or less have experient is minimal in comparison the growth being experienced by developed countries. Certainly there are shipway in which globalisation does bring benefits to developing countries on an economic level. However, overall it is clear that the benefits are felt more heavily in developed countries and the costs are felt more heavily in developing countries. This is much the same case when regarding the social and cultural effects of globalisation.Globalisation opens peoples lives to polish and to all its creativity and the flow of ideas and knowledge. Although the spread of ideas and images enriches the world, there is a put on the lineiness of reducing cultural concerns to protecting what can be bought and sold, neglecting community, cu stom and tradition. (Hirst &038 Thompson, 1996, p. 256) it is widely asserted, and and then frequently taken for granted, that we live in a global village where national cultures and boundaries are dissolving, we consume global brands, corporations have to be competitive in a global market place and governments have to be responsive to the aims of the global economy.In any case, globalisation produces a tension between sameness and difference, between the universal and the particular, and between cultural homogenization and cultural heterogenisation (Subhabrata &038 Linstead, 2001, p. 684) Americanisation is a major example of such cultural homogenisation, acting in many shipway which destroy global culture. Globalisation has increased transmission of cosmos culture easily and inexpensively from the developed countries of the North throughout the world. Consequently, despite efforts of nationally-based media to develop local video, movie, and video programs, many media market s in countries of Africa, Asia, and Latin America are unadulterated with productions from the U. S. Europe and a few countries in Asia. (Tomlinson, 1999, p. 98). Local critics of this trend lament not only the resulting silencing of domestic cultural expression, but also the hegemonic reach of westerly culture and the potential global homogenisation of set and cultural taste. (NA, 2005, p. 1) A report by the UN Educational, Scientific and cultural government showed that the world trade in goods with cultural content almost tripled between 1980 and 1991 from 67 cardinal dollars to 200 billion dollars. (Akulenko, 2008, p. 1) At the fondness of the entertainment industry film, music and television there is a growing say-so of US products.The humanity Trade Organisation rules do not allow countries to seal off imports on cultural grounds, which means there is nothing standing in the way of Western culture overtaking and eradicating the cultures of developing countries. It is argued that this could mean the end of cultural diversity, and the mirth of a uni-polar culture serving the needs of transnational corporations (Tomlinson, 1999, p. 134). Clearly globalisation is benefitting developed countries by allowing them to spread their culture and run on a global scale. However, for developing countries, their culture is in many ways being eroded and replaced with the typical Western culture.However, supporters of globalisation argue that it does not keep sense to talk of a world of 6 billion people bonny a monoculture. The spread of globalisation will undoubtedly bring changes to the countries it reaches, but change is an essential part of life. It must also be noted that globalisation is not all one-way traffic. Global products are absorbed into and change western life including such phenomena as Latinisation and Japanisation. (Hopper, 2007, p. 82) Similarly many of the arts and foods from developing cultures have move ingrained into Western society , presenting opportunities for developing countries to increase their cultural exporting.For example, curry, an Indian cuisine has require a global food eaten world-wide. However, Americanisation is a far greater cultural force which brings many benefits to Western countries. The impact of developing countries cultures is far smaller and there is the risk that Westernisation could lead to the destruction of the cultures of a number of developing countries. Another effect of globalisation is a global improvement in communications and technology. On the one hand, the electronic revolution has promoted the diversification of information as people in nearly every country are able to pop off their opinions and perspectives on issues, local and global, that impact their lives. (NA, 2005, p. ) policy-making groups from Chiapas to Pakistan have effectively used information technology to promote their perspectives and movements. On the other hand, this expansion of information technology has been exceedingly uneven, creating an international digital divide in such things as differences in inlet to and skills to use the internet. (NA, 2005, p. 1) Often, access to information technology and to telephone lines in many developing countries is mark offled by the state or is accessible only to a small minority who can afford them. (Hoogvelt A, 1997, p. 46) Thus, it can be seen that the technological benefits of globalisation are also being felt much more by developed countries than developing countries.This is the same case when regarding the effects of globalisation on a political level whizz of the biggest political issues surrounding globalisation, which particularly impacts on developing countries, is that many sovereign countries have lost tame of their economies and that such control has shifted to more powerful countries, multinational firms, and international financial institutions. The logic of this concern suggests that national sovereignty has progressiv ely and systematically been undermined by globalisation, leading to growing cynicism among political elites and their citizenries, especially among poor developing countries. (Pere, 2010, p. ) Critics argue that todays progressively interdependent global economy shifts economic power away from national governments and toward supranational organisations such as the WTO, the EU and the UN. Unelected bureaucrats now impose policies of the democratically elected governments of nation-states, thereby undermining the sovereignty of those states and limiting the nations ability to control its own destiny. (Hill, 2009, p. 30). Globalisation has seen state power decline as transnational processes grow in scale and number. The power of TNCs, with annual budgets greater than that of many states, and is the most glaring sign of this change. As economic and political life becomes more complex, many handed-down functions of state are transferred to global and regional international organisatio ns. (Gupta, 1997, p. 6) In this environment, developing countries are losing their influence on a national and global scale towards organisations largely controlled by developed countries. In this way, it is again clear that developed countries benefit from globalisation more so than developing countries. However, if these supranational organisations human activity their focus more towards aiding developing countries, a number of benefits could result. At the international level, supranational organisations such as the domain of a function aver and IMF must pay more attention to the reality that globalisation has generated extremes of inequality of assets and income crosswise the spectrum of developing countries. (Gupta, 1997, p. 06) foreign lending and grants could be more explicitly focused on cutting subsidies that benefit the rich, on supporting(a) and financing market-related land reform, and most significantly providing investment and policy advice for effective public e ducation. There is also a need for developed countries of the OECD to thoroughly review their neo-mercantilist trade policies. (Pere, 2010, p. 1) There is enough empirical evidence to show that protection of agriculture and textiles secernate against the poor of developing countries. The poor and dangerous in developing countries could also benefit from international financing of countercyclical safety net programmes, subject to certain conditions.These would include a solid record of sound fiscal policy the political capacity to essay such programmes free of corruption and a long-term fiscal capacity to service any debt that might be incurred. (Pere, 2010, p. 1) If these policies were instated, developing countries would benefit from globalisation in ways that match or exceed the political benefits that developed countries receive as a result of globalisation. Clearly globalisation is a force which brings an array of benefits and costs on a global scale. However, it is also clea r that developing countries are, in many cases, bearing the majority of these costs while developed countries are feeling the majority of the benefits. tour there are a number of economic, socio-cultural and political actions which could be taken to ensure developing countries benefit from globalisation to a similar extent to developed countries, as it stands, there can be no denying that globalisation is a force which favours developed countries over developing countries. Bibliography Akulenko. E, 2008, Cultural Aspects of globalisation, Accessed 5 may 2010, < http//emiliaakulenko. wordpress. com/2008/10/22/cultural-aspects-of-globalization/> Dollar. D and Kraay. A, 2001, Trade Growth and Poverty, Accessed 5 May 2010, http//www. imf. org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2001/09/dollar. htm Dowling. P, Hill. C and Liesch. D, 2009, International Business, Mc-Graw Hill, New York Downer. A, 1998, Annual Trade talk by the Minister for Foreign affairs Harnessing Globalisations Power, Access ed 5 May 2010, Evans T, 2001, The politics of human rights a global perspective, Pluto invoke, capital of the United Kingdom Gupta.S, 1997, The Political Economy of globalization, Kluwer Academic Publishers, mom Hill. C, 2009, International Business Competing in the Global Marketplace, Mc-Graw Hill International, New York Hoogvelt At, 1997, Globalisation and the Postcolonial World The New Political Economy of Development, Macmillan Press Ltd, capital of the United Kingdom Hopkins A. G. , 2002, Globalization in World History, Pimlico, London Hopper. P, 2007, Understanding Cultural Globalization, polity Press, Cambridge Horton. K and Patapan. H, 2004, Globalisation and Equality, Routledge, London Kirdar U, 1992, variety Threat or Opportunity Economic Change, United Nations Publications, New York.Linstead S &038 Subhabrata B, 2001, Globalization, Multiculturalism and other Fictions Colonialism for the new Millennium, RMIT University, Melbourne N. A, 2004, The Globalisation Debate, T he Spinney Press, Thirroul NSW 2515, Australia N. A, 2005, Introduction to Globalization After September 11, Social cognition Research Council, Accessed 5 May 2010, Pere. G, 2010, The dogmatic and Negative Consequences of Globalisation, Institute for Global Dialogue, Midrand. Stiglitz, J, 2002, Globalization and its Discontents, Routledge, Allen Lane, London Tomlinson. J, 1999, Globalization and Culture, University of cabbage Press, Chicago Waters M, 2002, Globalization, 2nd Edition, Routledge, Fetter Lane, London